<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ryan Cromwell &#187; SQL Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cromwellhaus.com/index.php/category/sql-server/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cromwellhaus.com</link>
	<description>Improving my craft...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>STUFF &amp; FOR XML PATH</title>
		<link>http://blog.cromwellhaus.com/index.php/2009/03/stuff-amp-for-xml-path/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cromwellhaus.com/index.php/2009/03/stuff-amp-for-xml-path/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/ryanc/archive/2009/03/02/stuff-amp-for-xml-path.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the get the job done front, my client had a question today that, while it makes me cringe a little to answer the way I did, it got him moving again.
[Thanks to Mike Levy for pointing me in the right direction]
My client has a small administrative utility that displays Things.&#160; Things can be applied [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cromwellhaus.com/index.php/2009/03/stuff-amp-for-xml-path/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL Server 2000 vs 2005 Lazy XML Validation</title>
		<link>http://blog.cromwellhaus.com/index.php/2008/08/sql-server-2000-vs-2005-lazy-xml-validation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.cromwellhaus.com/index.php/2008/08/sql-server-2000-vs-2005-lazy-xml-validation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/ryanc/archive/2008/08/19/sql-server-2000-vs-2005-lazy-xml-validation.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone was looking to do quick-and-dirty validation of an Xml document inside a SQL Server procedure today.&#160; I assumed, and regretted, that he meant 2005, which would have looked like this:
declare @xml1 xml&#160; declare @xml2 xml&#160; set @xml1 = &#8216;&#60;Node1&#62;&#60;Node2 attrib=&#8221;This is it.&#8221; /&#62;&#60;/Node1&#62;&#8217;set @xml2 = &#8216;&#60;Node1&#62;&#60;Node2 /&#62;&#60;/Node1&#62;&#8217;select Col.value(&#8217;count(./@attrib)&#8217;, &#8216;int&#8217;) as countfrom @xml1.nodes(&#8217;Node1/Node2&#8242;) as Tbl(Col)
select [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.cromwellhaus.com/index.php/2008/08/sql-server-2000-vs-2005-lazy-xml-validation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
